Skeptical Query-Answering in Constrained Default Logic

نویسندگان

  • Torsten Schaub
  • Michael Thielscher
چکیده

An approach to skeptical query-answering in Constrained Default Logic based on the Connection Method is presented. We adapt a recently proposed general method to skeptical reasoning in Default Logics—a method which does neither strictly require the inspection of all extensions nor the computation of entire extensions to decide whether a formula is skeptically entailed. We combine this method with a credulous reasoner which uses the Connection Method as the underlying calculus for classical logic. Furthermore, we develop the notion of a skeptical default proof and show how such a proof can be extracted whenever our calculus proves skeptical entailment of a particular query.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Nonmonotonic Skeptical Consequence Relation in Constrained Default Logic

This paper presents a study of the nonmonotonic consequence relation which models the skeptical reasoning formalised by constrained default logic. The nonmonotonic skeptical consequence relation is defined using the sequent calculus axiomatic system. We study the formal properties desirable for a “good” nonmonotonic relation: supraclassicality, cut, cautious monotony, cumulativity, absorption, ...

متن کامل

Query - answering in Reiter ’ s Default Logic ( Extended Abstract )

We introduce new concepts for default reasoning in the context of query-answering in regular default logic. For this purpose, we develop a proof-oriented approach for deciding whether a default theory has an extension containing a given query. The inherent problem in Reiter’s default logic is that it necessitates the inspection of all default rules for answering no matter what query. Also, defa...

متن کامل

An Approach to Query-Answering in Reiter's Default Logic and the Underlying Existence of Extensions Problem

We introduce new concepts for default reasoning in the context of query-answering in regular default logic. For this purpose, we develop a prooforiented approach for deciding whether a default theory has an extension containing a given query. The inherent problem in Reiter’s default logic is that it necessitates the inspection of all default rules for answering no matter what query. Also, defau...

متن کامل

Application of default reasoning to semantic processing under question - answering

We build the natural language question-answering system, where the query representation formula is subject to transformation in accordance to the set of default rules. This transformation is required to disambiguate entities in a vertical domain, where they usually have a principle meaning and a set of foreign ones. Default reasoning is discussed to be applicable to a variety of semantic proces...

متن کامل

Skeptical Rational Extensions

In this paper we propose a version of default logic with the following two properties: (1) defaults with mutually inconsistent justi-cations are never used together in constructing a set of default consequences of a theory; (2) the reasoning formalized by our logic is related to the traditional skeptical mode of default reasoning. Our logic is based on the concept of a skeptical rational extens...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996