Skeptical Query-Answering in Constrained Default Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
An approach to skeptical query-answering in Constrained Default Logic based on the Connection Method is presented. We adapt a recently proposed general method to skeptical reasoning in Default Logics—a method which does neither strictly require the inspection of all extensions nor the computation of entire extensions to decide whether a formula is skeptically entailed. We combine this method with a credulous reasoner which uses the Connection Method as the underlying calculus for classical logic. Furthermore, we develop the notion of a skeptical default proof and show how such a proof can be extracted whenever our calculus proves skeptical entailment of a particular query.
منابع مشابه
Nonmonotonic Skeptical Consequence Relation in Constrained Default Logic
This paper presents a study of the nonmonotonic consequence relation which models the skeptical reasoning formalised by constrained default logic. The nonmonotonic skeptical consequence relation is defined using the sequent calculus axiomatic system. We study the formal properties desirable for a “good” nonmonotonic relation: supraclassicality, cut, cautious monotony, cumulativity, absorption, ...
متن کاملQuery - answering in Reiter ’ s Default Logic ( Extended Abstract )
We introduce new concepts for default reasoning in the context of query-answering in regular default logic. For this purpose, we develop a proof-oriented approach for deciding whether a default theory has an extension containing a given query. The inherent problem in Reiter’s default logic is that it necessitates the inspection of all default rules for answering no matter what query. Also, defa...
متن کاملAn Approach to Query-Answering in Reiter's Default Logic and the Underlying Existence of Extensions Problem
We introduce new concepts for default reasoning in the context of query-answering in regular default logic. For this purpose, we develop a prooforiented approach for deciding whether a default theory has an extension containing a given query. The inherent problem in Reiter’s default logic is that it necessitates the inspection of all default rules for answering no matter what query. Also, defau...
متن کاملApplication of default reasoning to semantic processing under question - answering
We build the natural language question-answering system, where the query representation formula is subject to transformation in accordance to the set of default rules. This transformation is required to disambiguate entities in a vertical domain, where they usually have a principle meaning and a set of foreign ones. Default reasoning is discussed to be applicable to a variety of semantic proces...
متن کاملSkeptical Rational Extensions
In this paper we propose a version of default logic with the following two properties: (1) defaults with mutually inconsistent justi-cations are never used together in constructing a set of default consequences of a theory; (2) the reasoning formalized by our logic is related to the traditional skeptical mode of default reasoning. Our logic is based on the concept of a skeptical rational extens...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996